Northampton County: Council refuses to sue over contract
During a brief yet contentious March 20 meeting, Northampton County's five Republican council members staved off an attack aimed at an $84,000 no-bid contract approved by Executive John Brown last month. It's a public relations consultant contract with Bethlehem's Sahl Communications, which is run by Kim Plyler.
Two weeks ago, when Lamont McClure first asked council to condemn the no-bid contract, all five Republicans voted to table the matter. Last night, they rejected several McClure resolutions supported by all four Democrats, including one that would authorize council solicitor Phil Lauer to sue.
But is this matter over? McClure hinted last night that someone is waiting in the wings, ready to sue.
While this matter was tabled, Brown paid Sahl $7,000 under the disputed contract. That's why McClure said they needed to sue. Referring to an earlier memo from Solicitor Lauer, ruling that the contract is illegal, McClure warned fellow council members, "You're free to ignore the advice of your own lawyer. I think you do that at your own peril."
Professional service?
Under county law, all professional services must be competitively bid. But is a public relations consultant a professional service? County solicitor Victor Scomillio says no, calling it a "nonprofessional service done in a professional way."
Lauer, who recently won a case against former County Executive John Stoffa over the meaning of professional services, believes county law must be clarified.
"It doesn't seem to me to make a lot of sense for us to be going to court periodically to have a judge tell us, 'Yes, this was a professional service' or 'No it wasn't,'" Scomillio said.
Glenn Geissinger, who is in the public relations business himself, was ironically placed in the position of arguing that what he does is not a professional service, observing that no state licensing or particular certification or membership in any professional organization is required.
But McClure had argued that Sahl is a member of several professional organizations and may even be accredited.
Seth Vaughn suggested that McClure was advocating a witch hunt, something McClure denied.
"It isn't a witch hunt," he disagreed "It's called doing my job."
Ken Kraft argued that spending $84,000 for a public relations consultant who answers to the executive is a waste of taxpayer money.
"The county executive will have to answer to the voters for the decision of hiring a communications company," said President Peg Ferraro. "We can think it's a terrible waste of taxpayer money, but we are voting on procedure."
"We struggle with the Administrative Code every day," said Procurement Officer Kathryn Anderson. "There'a a lot of irregularities in there. There's a lot of things left open to interpretation. We would welcome anyone's input and help in revising that Code."
Anderson also told council that, before he awarded the no-bid contract to Sahl, Brown did reach out to the Procurement Office.
"We really did not feel that there was anything being done here that was not appropriate," she said. She told cvouncil member that this contract was nothing "out of the norm."
Why a no-bid?
Lauer had another problem with the contract. No-bid contracts for non-professional services are permitted by county law, but the executive must first issue an Executive Order, explaining why competitive negotiation would be impractical or imprudent.
That never happened.
The orders that Brown signed, after the fact, still failed to provide a satisfactory explanation, according to Lauer. Anderson acknowledged, in response to questions from McClure, that an Executive Order is needed before the contract is executed, and failure to do so is a "defective process."
Looming lawsuit
Before the vote, McClure hinted that, if council failed to act on their own, a lawsuit might be filed anyway, though he did not say from where.
"I can promise you the lawsuit won't be good, if in fact one happens, and if in fact we don't control it. ... If we allow someone else to do that, we have failed."
If such a lawsuit is filed, it won't be by council.








